On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 12:04 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> > Since now you're using info exclusively inside this block,
> > you can move its declaration here as well.
>
> Except that patch 19/18 uses it too (it was that patch that led to me
> re-doing this one and posting a v3.5)
Nevermind then :)
On 10/06/2016 11:39 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 10:14 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Andrea had the right idea when he disabled the "reserve an extra
unused slot" bit for aarch64/virt. For *any* PCI Express-based
machine, it is pointless since 1) an extra legacy-PCI slot can't b
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 10:14 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> Andrea had the right idea when he disabled the "reserve an extra
> unused slot" bit for aarch64/virt. For *any* PCI Express-based
> machine, it is pointless since 1) an extra legacy-PCI slot can't be
> used for hotplug, since hotplug into lega
Andrea had the right idea when he disabled the "reserve an extra
unused slot" bit for aarch64/virt. For *any* PCI Express-based
machine, it is pointless since 1) an extra legacy-PCI slot can't be
used for hotplug, since hotplug into legacy PCI slots doesn't work on
PCI Express machinetypes, and 2)
