On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:43 PM, John Ferlan jfer...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/17/2015 03:25 PM, Matthias Gatto wrote:
The purpose of these patches is to introduce quorum for libvirt
I've try to follow this proposal:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg00533.html
Before
On 03/17/2015 03:25 PM, Matthias Gatto wrote:
The purpose of these patches is to introduce quorum for libvirt
I've try to follow this proposal:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg00533.html
Before we reach a year waiting on this and so we make some progress...
I
On 31.03.2015 14:39, Matthias Gatto wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Matthias Gatto
matthias.ga...@outscale.com wrote:
The purpose of these patches is to introduce quorum for libvirt
I've try to follow this proposal:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg00533.html
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Matthias Gatto
matthias.ga...@outscale.com wrote:
The purpose of these patches is to introduce quorum for libvirt
I've try to follow this proposal:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg00533.html
This feature ask for 6 task:
1) Allow a
The purpose of these patches is to introduce quorum for libvirt
I've try to follow this proposal:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg00533.html
This feature ask for 6 task:
1) Allow a _virStorageSource to contain more than one backing store.
Because all the actual libvirt