Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v4 01/11] tests: Add test case for x86 feature parsing compatibility

2016-09-30 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:55:33 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 29/09/2016 23:14, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > + * "-foo" overrides "+foo" > > + * "[+-]foo" overrides "foo=..." > > Is this something that people are actually using? Can we detect it and > deprecate it in 2.8, and

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v4 01/11] tests: Add test case for x86 feature parsing compatibility

2016-09-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 29/09/2016 23:14, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > + * "-foo" overrides "+foo" > + * "[+-]foo" overrides "foo=..." Is this something that people are actually using? Can we detect it and deprecate it in 2.8, and drop it in 2.9? Paolo > + * "foo_bar" should be translated to "foo-bar"

[libvirt] [PATCH v4 01/11] tests: Add test case for x86 feature parsing compatibility

2016-09-29 Thread Eduardo Habkost
Add a new test case to ensure the existing behavior of the feature parsing code wlil be kept. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- Changes series v3 -> v4: * New patch added to series --- tests/test-x86-cpuid-compat.c | 39 +++ 1 file