On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 19:54:47 +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 22:51:58 +0530, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote:
>> >>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 19:54:47 +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 22:51:58 +0530, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote:
> >> Currently, the Host object looks like
> >>
> >> struct _virStorageNetHostDef {
>
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 22:51:58 +0530, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote:
>> Currently, the Host object looks like
>>
>> struct _virStorageNetHostDef {
>> char *name;
>> char *port;
>> int transport; /*
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 22:51:58 +0530, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote:
> Currently, the Host object looks like
>
> struct _virStorageNetHostDef {
> char *name;
> char *port;
> int transport; /* virStorageNetHostTransport */
> char *socket; /* path to unix socket */
Currently, the Host object looks like
struct _virStorageNetHostDef {
char *name;
char *port;
int transport; /* virStorageNetHostTransport */
char *socket; /* path to unix socket */
}
We don't actually need a 'name' and 'port' if the transport type is unix
domain