On 09/12/2014 06:32 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 09/12/14 05:55, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Take the previous patch one step further. In addition to
>> automatically selecting byte mode with fallback if the
>> user's result would be rounded, we also want to give the
>> user a way to guarantee byte mode
On 09/12/14 05:55, Eric Blake wrote:
> Take the previous patch one step further. In addition to
> automatically selecting byte mode with fallback if the
> user's result would be rounded, we also want to give the
> user a way to guarantee byte mode even if rounding is not
> required, with no fallba
Take the previous patch one step further. In addition to
automatically selecting byte mode with fallback if the
user's result would be rounded, we also want to give the
user a way to guarantee byte mode even if rounding is not
required, with no fallback if the remote side doesn't
support byte mode
