On 3/26/19 1:13 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
TL;DR:
After more thought, I'm reluctant to make a domain job an opaque type.
I'm also leaning towards withdrawing virDomainListJobIds() from the set
of APIs I'm proposing for 5.2, on the grounds that with a documented
magic job id of '0' that means "the
On 3/26/19 12:08 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:13:52AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Introduce a few more new public APIs related to incremental backups.
>> This builds on the previous notion of a checkpoint (without an
>> existing checkpoint, the new API is a full
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:13:52AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> Introduce a few more new public APIs related to incremental backups.
> This builds on the previous notion of a checkpoint (without an
> existing checkpoint, the new API is a full backup, differing from
> virDomainBlockCopy in the point
Introduce a few more new public APIs related to incremental backups.
This builds on the previous notion of a checkpoint (without an
existing checkpoint, the new API is a full backup, differing from
virDomainBlockCopy in the point of time chosen and in operation on
multiple disks at once); and also
