[libvirt] [PATCHv2] Don't include non-migratable features in host-model

2014-09-05 Thread Ján Tomko
Commit fba6bc4 introduced support for the 'invtsc' feature, which blocks migration. We should not include it in the host-model CPU by default, because it's intended to be used with migration. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138221 --- v2: added tests and comment, fixed a typo

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] Don't include non-migratable features in host-model

2014-09-05 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/05/2014 04:48 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: Commit fba6bc4 introduced support for the 'invtsc' feature, which blocks migration. We should not include it in the host-model CPU by default, because it's intended to be used with migration. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138221 ---

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] Don't include non-migratable features in host-model

2014-09-05 Thread Peter Krempa
On 09/05/14 13:55, Eric Blake wrote: On 09/05/2014 04:48 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: Commit fba6bc4 introduced support for the 'invtsc' feature, which blocks migration. We should not include it in the host-model CPU by default, because it's intended to be used with migration.

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] Don't include non-migratable features in host-model

2014-09-05 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:48:00 +0200, Jano Tomko wrote: Commit fba6bc4 introduced support for the 'invtsc' feature, which blocks migration. We should not include it in the host-model CPU by default, because it's intended to be used with migration.