Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] build: let autobuild check more code

2011-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:39:26AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: On 12/16/2011 02:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: @@ -71,23 +76,7 @@ if [ -x /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-gcc ]; then --host=i686-pc-mingw32 \ --prefix=$AUTOBUILD_INSTALL_ROOT/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw \

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] build: let autobuild check more code

2011-12-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:02:23AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: Many times, we don't notice a bug in src/libvirt_private.syms until someone attempts a build with modules enabled. Likewise, some gcc warnings about no % in a printf format string only appear under --disable-nls. And configure.ac

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] build: let autobuild check more code

2011-12-16 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/16/2011 02:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:02:23AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: Many times, we don't notice a bug in src/libvirt_private.syms until someone attempts a build with modules enabled. Likewise, some gcc warnings about no % in a printf format string

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] build: let autobuild check more code

2011-12-16 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/16/2011 08:42 AM, Eric Blake wrote: I'm pushing this under the build-breaker rule, which gets me to the next build failure that I'll be patching soon: Creating library file: .libs/libvirt.dll.a Cannot export virDomainEventDispatch: symbol not defined Cannot export

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] build: let autobuild check more code

2011-12-16 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/16/2011 02:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: @@ -71,23 +76,7 @@ if [ -x /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-gcc ]; then --host=i686-pc-mingw32 \ --prefix=$AUTOBUILD_INSTALL_ROOT/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw \ --enable-compile-warnings=error \ ---without-xen \ -

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] build: let autobuild check more code

2011-12-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:02:23AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: Many times, we don't notice a bug in src/libvirt_private.syms until someone attempts a build with modules enabled. Likewise, some gcc warnings about no % in a printf format string only appear under --disable-nls. And configure.ac

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] build: let autobuild check more code

2011-12-15 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/15/2011 01:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:02:23AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: Many times, we don't notice a bug in src/libvirt_private.syms until someone attempts a build with modules enabled. Likewise, some gcc warnings about no % in a printf format string

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] build: let autobuild check more code

2011-12-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:00:02PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: On 12/15/2011 01:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:02:23AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: Many times, we don't notice a bug in src/libvirt_private.syms until someone attempts a build with modules enabled.

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2] build: let autobuild check more code

2011-12-15 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/15/2011 04:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:00:02PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: On 12/15/2011 01:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:02:23AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: Many times, we don't notice a bug in src/libvirt_private.syms until

[libvirt] [PATCHv2] build: let autobuild check more code

2011-12-14 Thread Eric Blake
Many times, we don't notice a bug in src/libvirt_private.syms until someone attempts a build with modules enabled. Likewise, some gcc warnings about no % in a printf format string only appear under --disable-nls. And configure.ac should automatically be excluding modules on mingw without us