On 10/13/2012 03:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
When an image has no backing file, using VIR_STORAGE_FILE_AUTO
for its type is a bit confusing. Additionally, a future patch
would like to reserve a default value for the case of no file
type specified in the XML, but different from the current use
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
When an image has no backing file, using VIR_STORAGE_FILE_AUTO
for its type is a bit confusing. Additionally, a future patch
would like to reserve a default value for the case of no file
type specified in the XML, but
When an image has no backing file, using VIR_STORAGE_FILE_AUTO
for its type is a bit confusing. Additionally, a future patch
would like to reserve a default value for the case of no file
type specified in the XML, but different from the current use
of -1 to imply probing, since probing is not
