Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2 2/2] qemu: increase the timeout before sending SIGKILL to qemu process

2012-02-03 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/03/2012 10:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/03/2012 01:24 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:54:29PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: >>> The current default method of terminating the qemu process is to send >>> a SIGTERM, wait for up to 1.6 seconds for it to cleanly shutdown,

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2 2/2] qemu: increase the timeout before sending SIGKILL to qemu process

2012-02-03 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/03/2012 01:24 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:54:29PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: >> The current default method of terminating the qemu process is to send >> a SIGTERM, wait for up to 1.6 seconds for it to cleanly shutdown, then >> send a SIGKILL and wait for up to 1.4 s

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2 2/2] qemu: increase the timeout before sending SIGKILL to qemu process

2012-02-03 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:54:29PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: > The current default method of terminating the qemu process is to send > a SIGTERM, wait for up to 1.6 seconds for it to cleanly shutdown, then > send a SIGKILL and wait for up to 1.4 seconds more for the process to > terminate. This is

[libvirt] [PATCHv2 2/2] qemu: increase the timeout before sending SIGKILL to qemu process

2012-02-02 Thread Laine Stump
The current default method of terminating the qemu process is to send a SIGTERM, wait for up to 1.6 seconds for it to cleanly shutdown, then send a SIGKILL and wait for up to 1.4 seconds more for the process to terminate. This is problematic because occasionally 1.6 seconds is not long enough for t