Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2 2/2] virsh: output scaled values with correct units

2012-05-01 Thread Eric Blake
On 05/01/2012 09:21 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 04/30/2012 06:27 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> The recent push to use correct scaling terms (kB for 1000, KiB for >> 1024 - such as commit 9dfdead) missed some places in virsh. >> > > ACK Thanks; series pushed. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2 2/2] virsh: output scaled values with correct units

2012-05-01 Thread Stefan Berger
On 04/30/2012 06:27 PM, Eric Blake wrote: The recent push to use correct scaling terms (kB for 1000, KiB for 1024 - such as commit 9dfdead) missed some places in virsh. ACK -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[libvirt] [PATCHv2 2/2] virsh: output scaled values with correct units

2012-04-30 Thread Eric Blake
The recent push to use correct scaling terms (kB for 1000, KiB for 1024 - such as commit 9dfdead) missed some places in virsh. * tools/virsh.c (prettyCapacity, cmdDominfo, cmdFreecell) (cmdNodeinfo, cmdNodeMemStats): Use KiB, not kB, when referring to multiples of 1024. * tests/virshtest.c: Update