I want to include this count in the xml output of networks, but
calling it connections in the XML sounds better than usageCount, and it
would be better if the name in the XML matched the variable name.
In a few places, usageCount was being initialized to 0, but this is
unnecessary, because
On 08/14/2012 01:10 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
I want to include this count in the xml output of networks, but
calling it connections in the XML sounds better than usageCount, and it
would be better if the name in the XML matched the variable name.
In a few places, usageCount was being
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Kyle Mestery kmest...@cisco.com
On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:10 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
I want to include this count in the xml output of networks, but
calling it connections in the XML sounds better than usageCount, and it
would be better if the name in the XML matched
