On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:54:16PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
The name 'virDomainDiskSnapshot' didn't fit in with our normal
conventions of using a prefix hinting that it is related to a
virDomainSnapshotPtr. Also, a future patch will reuse the
enum for declaring where the VM memory is stored.
On 08/24/2012 01:00 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:54:16PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
The name 'virDomainDiskSnapshot' didn't fit in with our normal
conventions of using a prefix hinting that it is related to a
virDomainSnapshotPtr. Also, a future patch will reuse the
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 09:49:38AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/24/2012 01:00 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:54:16PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
The name 'virDomainDiskSnapshot' didn't fit in with our normal
conventions of using a prefix hinting that it is related to a
On 08/24/2012 09:57 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
ACK, the only annoyance is that the name being longuer the simple
substitution leads to lines over 80 characters, I would be a proponent
of dropping the indentation to the opening ( for the sake of keeping
everything on one 80 char line
The name 'virDomainDiskSnapshot' didn't fit in with our normal
conventions of using a prefix hinting that it is related to a
virDomainSnapshotPtr. Also, a future patch will reuse the
enum for declaring where the VM memory is stored.
* src/conf/snapshot_conf.h (virDomainDiskSnapshot): Rename...
