Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv3] build: more workarounds for if_bridge.h

2013-08-11 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/09/2013 09:38 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 05:10:26PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: This is a second attempt at fixing the problem first attempted in commit 2df8d99; basically undoing the fact that

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv3] build: more workarounds for if_bridge.h

2013-08-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 05:10:26PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: This is a second attempt at fixing the problem first attempted in commit 2df8d99; basically undoing the fact that it was reverted in commit 43cee32f, plus fixing two more issues: the code in configure.ac has to EXACTLY match

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv3] build: more workarounds for if_bridge.h

2013-08-09 Thread Eric Blake
On 08/09/2013 09:38 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 05:10:26PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: This is a second attempt at fixing the problem first attempted in commit 2df8d99; basically undoing the fact that it was reverted in commit 43cee32f, plus fixing two more issues: the

[libvirt] [PATCHv3] build: more workarounds for if_bridge.h

2013-08-07 Thread Eric Blake
This is a second attempt at fixing the problem first attempted in commit 2df8d99; basically undoing the fact that it was reverted in commit 43cee32f, plus fixing two more issues: the code in configure.ac has to EXACTLY match virnetdevbridge.c with regards to declaring in6 types before using