On 02/10/13 14:30, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:45:27AM +0300, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
This does change the interface names from nice low integers to random larger
integers, but I don't see that an issue. And the caller can select any
other name they like if that's not a
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:45:27AM +0300, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
> The previous veth interface naming scheme tried to find the lowest unused
> index for both the parent and container veth interfaces. That's susceptible
> to race conditions when multiple containers are started at the same time.
>
The previous veth interface naming scheme tried to find the lowest unused
index for both the parent and container veth interfaces. That's susceptible
to race conditions when multiple containers are started at the same time.
Try to pick a random unused interface id for the parent if one wasn't giv
