On 08/09/2015 01:39 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 08:33 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Like Martin noted, I've been looking through this series as well. I
>> too haven't had a ton of time to devote to it over the last week or so
>> since I'm in the middle of a move. Also being so close to fre
On 08/03/2015 08:33 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
> Like Martin noted, I've been looking through this series as well. I
> too haven't had a ton of time to devote to it over the last week or so
> since I'm in the middle of a move. Also being so close to freeze - it
> just didn't feel right to shimmy it in
On 07/25/2015 03:58 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> Since the first 3 patches of V2 were ACKed and uncontroversial, I
> fixed the small problems pointed out in the reviews and pushed
> them. Thus, Patches 01-13 here correspond to Patches 04-17 in V2.
>
> Most of these patches were already ACKed in V2 (
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 03:58:24PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Since the first 3 patches of V2 were ACKed and uncontroversial, I
fixed the small problems pointed out in the reviews and pushed
them. Thus, Patches 01-13 here correspond to Patches 04-17 in V2.
4 patches with the DHCP rework that go
Since the first 3 patches of V2 were ACKed and uncontroversial, I
fixed the small problems pointed out in the reviews and pushed
them. Thus, Patches 01-13 here correspond to Patches 04-17 in V2.
Most of these patches were already ACKed in V2 (pending my making
small fixes pointed out in review), b
