On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:01:22AM +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
On 08/12/2016 04:59 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:17:10 +0200
Ján Tomko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Daniel
On 08/12/2016 04:59 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:17:10 +0200
Ján Tomko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Ján
On 08/11/2016 11:11 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:17:34AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 08/11/2016 09:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:00:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Aug
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:17:10 +0200
Ján Tomko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:17:10 +0200
Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:00:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:17:34AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 08/11/2016 09:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:00:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:27:15PM +0200, Ján Tomko
On 08/11/2016 09:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:00:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:27:15PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
I'm wondering about generalizing this. eg what if
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:00:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:27:15PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> >
> >
>
> I'm wondering about
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:00:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:27:15PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I'm wondering about generalizing this. eg what if there are
> > other device
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:00:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:27:15PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
I'm wondering about generalizing this. eg what if there are
other device models where we want the ability to set a
revision. We don't really want to invent a
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:27:15PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
>
>
I'm wondering about generalizing this. eg what if there are
other device models where we want the ability to set a
revision. We don't really want to invent a new sub-elment
named after each device model
>
Regards,
Daniel
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227354
---
docs/formatdomain.html.in | 8
docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 3 +++
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 4
12 matches
Mail list logo