On 03/25/2011 03:56 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 05:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:18:30PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Direct access to an open file is so much simpler than passing
>>> everything through a pipe!
>>
>> Did you test with SELinux in enforcing
On 03/10/2011 05:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:18:30PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Direct access to an open file is so much simpler than passing
>> everything through a pipe!
>
> Did you test with SELinux in enforcing mode - there's a very
> slight chance this could
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:18:30PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> Direct access to an open file is so much simpler than passing
> everything through a pipe!
Did you test with SELinux in enforcing mode - there's a very
slight chance this could impact things, though I think we
do label all FDs correctly
Direct access to an open file is so much simpler than passing
everything through a pipe!
* src/qemu/qemu_driver.c (qemudOpenAsUID)
(qemudDomainSaveImageClose): Delete.
(qemudDomainSaveImageOpen): Rename...
(qemuDomainSaveImageOpen): ...and drop read_pid argument. Use
virFileOpenAs instead of qemu