* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Il 28/03/2014 10:18, Gonglei (Arei) ha scritto:
> >>> > Can you please give more details at how you are triggering the problem
> >>> > with libvirt? I think Paolo is probably right - the bug is more likely
> >>> > to be in libvirt not expecting the ra
Il 28/03/2014 12:30, Dr. David Alan Gilbert ha scritto:
> Another reason for doing it in libvirt is that the serialization
> between cancellation and completion of migration ultimately is
> controlled by libvirt's lock. Doing this in QEMU makes it harder to
> reason about concurrency.
I think y
