Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 15/17] target-i386: Define static "base" CPU model

2016-12-20 Thread David Hildenbrand
Am 16.12.2016 um 17:02 schrieb Jiri Denemark: On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 21:57:45 -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 07:18:47PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: Am 02.12.2016 um 22:18 schrieb Eduardo Habkost: The query-cpu-model-expand QMP command needs at least one static

Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 15/17] target-i386: Define static "base" CPU model

2016-12-16 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 21:57:45 -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 07:18:47PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > Am 02.12.2016 um 22:18 schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > > > The query-cpu-model-expand QMP command needs at least one static > > > model, to allow the "static"

Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 15/17] target-i386: Define static "base" CPU model

2016-12-06 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:32:48AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: [...] > > > > I would like to hear from libvirt developers what they think. I > > still don't know what they plan to use the type=static expansion > > results for. > > > > > > > > How long is the static expansion on a recent

Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 15/17] target-i386: Define static "base" CPU model

2016-12-06 Thread David Hildenbrand
Am 06.12.2016 um 00:57 schrieb Eduardo Habkost: On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 07:18:47PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: Am 02.12.2016 um 22:18 schrieb Eduardo Habkost: The query-cpu-model-expand QMP command needs at least one static model, to allow the "static" expansion mode to be implemented.

Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 15/17] target-i386: Define static "base" CPU model

2016-12-05 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 07:18:47PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Am 02.12.2016 um 22:18 schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > > The query-cpu-model-expand QMP command needs at least one static > > model, to allow the "static" expansion mode to be implemented. > > Instead of defining static versions of