On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 09:30:32AM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 16:56:43 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 15:38 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > So I agree neither
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 09:30 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 16:56:43 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > So I agree neither scenario is exactly perfect, but I still think
> > > adding non-transitional alias
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 16:56:43 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 15:38 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
[...]
So I agree neither scenario is exactly perfect, but I still think
adding non-transitional alias devices
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 16:56:43 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 15:38 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
[...]
> So I agree neither scenario is exactly perfect, but I still think
> adding non-transitional alias devices would overall be more
> user-friendly.
I don't think it
On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 15:38 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > -device virtio-blk-pci-non-transitional \
> > -device virtio-net-pci-non-transitional \
> > -device virtio-gpu-pci-non-transitional \
> >
> > and you wouldn't have to question why you can use the
> > non-transitional
Hi,
> -device virtio-blk-pci-non-transitional \
> -device virtio-net-pci-non-transitional \
> -device virtio-gpu-pci-non-transitional \
>
> and you wouldn't have to question why you can use the
> non-transitional variant for pretty much everything, except for the
> few cases where you
Sorry to resurrect such an old thread, but I have been wondering...
On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 17:57 -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
[...]
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> * Removed *-0.9 devices. Nobody will want to use them, if
> transitional devices work with legacy drivers
> (Gerd Hoffmann, Michael S.
