On 7/25/19 2:06 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow writes:
>
>> On 7/24/19 12:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> John Snow writes:
>>>
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
It is useful when
John Snow writes:
> On 7/24/19 12:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>>>
>>> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
>>> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>>>
>>>
On 7/24/19 12:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow writes:
>
>> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>>
>> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
>> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir
John Snow writes:
> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>
> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> [Added deprecation information. --js]
>
On 7/17/19 1:39 PM, John Snow wrote:
> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>
> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> [Added deprecation
On 7/17/19 1:39 PM, John Snow wrote:
> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>
> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> [Added deprecation
