On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 02:43:40PM +0100, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:26:58PM +0100, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> >> All,
> >> Attached is a *very* rough first draft of the secure migration code
> >> I'm
> >> working on. This is in no way read
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:26:58PM +0100, Chris Lalancette wrote:
>> All,
>> Attached is a *very* rough first draft of the secure migration code I'm
>> working on. This is in no way ready for merge. That being said, this
>> demonstrates the basic idea that I'm pursui
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:45:06AM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
> Okay I have tried to think again about this, from the code fragment
> before and discussions on IRC while performances are tolerable, there
> is a lot of costs related to the 64KB chunking imposed by the XML-RPC.
This isn't XM
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:26:58PM +0100, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> All,
> Attached is a *very* rough first draft of the secure migration code I'm
> working on. This is in no way ready for merge. That being said, this
> demonstrates the basic idea that I'm pursuing, and I've actually been ab
All,
Attached is a *very* rough first draft of the secure migration code I'm
working on. This is in no way ready for merge. That being said, this
demonstrates the basic idea that I'm pursuing, and I've actually been able to
perform a KVM secure live migrate using this. Before I go and finis
