On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 20.05.2015 19:35, John Ferlan wrote:
On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 20.05.2015 19:35, John Ferlan wrote:
On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache
On 05/22/2015 08:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
RPM preserves mtimes, not ctimes.
We use ctimes since commit f5059a929e0db6689e908e354b13a60661c143e1
Change QEMU capabilities cache to check ctime instead of mtime
CommitDate: 2014-03-11 10:52:29 +
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:00:27AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 05/22/2015 08:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
RPM preserves mtimes, not ctimes.
We use ctimes since commit f5059a929e0db6689e908e354b13a60661c143e1
Change QEMU capabilities cache to check ctime instead of mtime
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:02:57AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 20.05.2015 19:35, John Ferlan wrote:
On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
On Wed, May 20, 2015
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:23:12PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:02:57AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 20.05.2015 19:35, John Ferlan wrote:
On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 20.05.2015 19:35, John Ferlan wrote:
On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 01:35:43PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
Original commit id
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache file would be
discarded if either the QEMU binary or libvirtd 'ctime' changes; however,
the code only discarded if the QEMU binary time didn't match or if the
new libvirtd ctime was later
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache file would be
discarded if either the QEMU binary or libvirtd 'ctime' changes; however,
the code only discarded if the QEMU
On 05/20/2015 09:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache file would be
discarded if either the QEMU binary or libvirtd 'ctime'
s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache file would be
discarded if either the QEMU binary or libvirtd 'ctime' changes;
On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache file would be
discarded if either the
13 matches
Mail list logo
