On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:00:27AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 05/22/2015 08:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> >>
> >> RPM preserves mtimes, not ctimes.
> >> We use ctimes since commit f5059a929e0db6689e908e354b13a60661c143e1
> >> Change QEMU capabilities cache to check ctime inste
On 05/22/2015 08:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>
>> RPM preserves mtimes, not ctimes.
>> We use ctimes since commit f5059a929e0db6689e908e354b13a60661c143e1
>> Change QEMU capabilities cache to check ctime instead of mtime
>> CommitDate: 2014-03-11 10:52:29 +
>>
>> http://libvirt.org
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:23:12PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:02:57AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > On 20.05.2015 19:35, John Ferlan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:02:57AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > On 20.05.2015 19:35, John Ferlan wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > >> s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
> > >>
> > >
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 20.05.2015 19:35, John Ferlan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> >> s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> >>> https://bugzill
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 20.05.2015 19:35, John Ferlan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> >> s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> >>> https://bugzill
On 20.05.2015 19:35, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
>>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
>>>
>>> Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicat
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 01:35:43PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
> >
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
> >>
> >> Original
On 05/20/2015 10:22 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
>>
>> Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache file would be
>> discarded if eit
s/read/refresh/ in the commit message?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
>
> Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache file would be
> discarded if either the QEMU binary or libvirtd 'ctime' changes; how
On 05/20/2015 09:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
>>
>> Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache file would be
>> discarded if either the QEMU binary or libvirtd 'ct
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:52:57AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
>
> Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache file would be
> discarded if either the QEMU binary or libvirtd 'ctime' changes; however,
> the code only discarded if the Q
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195882
Original commit id 'cbde3589' indicates that the cache file would be
discarded if either the QEMU binary or libvirtd 'ctime' changes; however,
the code only discarded if the QEMU binary time didn't match or if the
new libvirtd ctime was later tha
13 matches
Mail list logo