Re: [libvirt] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] gluster pools

2013-11-01 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/18/2013 11:30 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > This addresses the review from RFCv1 for splitting the glfs checks > to be different from the storage backend checks: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-October/msg00645.html > > I'm still just in RFC stage; wanting to make sure I have th

Re: [libvirt] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] gluster pools

2013-10-18 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/18/2013 11:30 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > This addresses the review from RFCv1 for splitting the glfs checks > to be different from the storage backend checks: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-October/msg00645.html > > I'm still just in RFC stage; wanting to make sure I have th

[libvirt] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] gluster pools

2013-10-18 Thread Eric Blake
This addresses the review from RFCv1 for splitting the glfs checks to be different from the storage backend checks: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-October/msg00645.html I'm still just in RFC stage; wanting to make sure I have the documentation correct for sample XML prior to actu