On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On 01/08/2014 05:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 01/08/2014 02:45 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:26:23AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Hello,
following the bugzilla here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
Hi,
any chance this also gets backported to EL 6 ?
I would open a BZ, but just if it's technically possible.
The version difference is quite huge.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +4
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any chance this also gets backported to EL 6 ?
>
> I would open a BZ, but just if it's technically possible.
> The version difference is quite huge.
>
The bug for RH EL 6 has been already opened as a clone some months ago:
https://bugzi
On 01/08/2014 05:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/08/2014 02:45 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:26:23AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> following the bugzilla here:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019053
>
> This bug was tagged against upstream
On 01/08/2014 02:45 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:26:23AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>> Hello,
>> following the bugzilla here:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019053
This bug was tagged against upstream libvirt. If you need it backported
to specific Fed
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:26:23AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Hello,
> following the bugzilla here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019053
>
> we have
> "
> This is now fixed by v1.1.3-188-g0196845 and v1.1.3-189-ge3ef20d
> "
>
> Does this mean that f19 that has
> libvirt-1.0.
