Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-May/msg00686.html
>
> Perhaps configure.ac should be changed to reject libxl upfront.
Yes, good idea.
> It looks
> like the assignment of LIBXL_CFLAGS should be moved up, so that
>
On Wed, May 11, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-May/msg00686.html
Perhaps configure.ac should be changed to reject libxl upfront. It looks
like the assignment of LIBXL_CFLAGS should be moved up, so that
AC_CHECK_LIB gets the -DLIBXL_API_VERSION as well. I
On 05/11/2016 12:01 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
>> In LIBXL_API_VERSION 0x040400, the libxl_domain_create_restore API
>> gained a parameter for specifying restore parameters. Switch to
>> using version 0x040400, which will be useful in a subsequent commit
>> to
On Mon, May 02, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> In LIBXL_API_VERSION 0x040400, the libxl_domain_create_restore API
> gained a parameter for specifying restore parameters. Switch to
> using version 0x040400, which will be useful in a subsequent commit
> to specify the Xen migration stream version when
