Re: [libvirt] [Xen-devel] Opinions on removing the old, legacy libvirt Xen driver

2016-11-18 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 14:25 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Hi All, > > I briefly mentioned this at an evening event during the KVM Forum / > Xen Dev  > Summit, but the list is certainly a better place to discuss such a > topic. What  > do folks think about finally removing the old, legacy, xend-based

Re: [libvirt] [Xen-devel] Opinions on removing the old, legacy libvirt Xen driver

2016-11-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:25:18PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Hi All, > > I briefly mentioned this at an evening event during the KVM Forum / Xen Dev > Summit, but the list is certainly a better place to discuss such a topic. > What do folks think about finally removing the old, legacy, xend-based

Re: [libvirt] [Xen-devel] Opinions on removing the old, legacy libvirt Xen driver

2016-11-19 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:25:18PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Hi All, > > I briefly mentioned this at an evening event during the KVM Forum / Xen Dev > Summit, but the list is certainly a better place to discuss such a topic. > What do folks think about finally removing the old, legacy, xend-based

Re: [libvirt] [Xen-devel] Opinions on removing the old, legacy libvirt Xen driver

2016-11-21 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 23:37 +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: >  > I'm not familiar with Xen to such detail, particularly with its > history, > but allow me to (hopefully) help you with the decision by saying that > we > dropped support for any QEmu older than 0.12.0 (released on December > 2009).  A