On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 17:46 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 02:55:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > So, to be clear, you're advocating for keeping our list of target
> > platforms unchanged and exempt Meson specifically from the implicit
> > requirement we've had
On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 14:21 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 09:36 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Jumping in a bit late, but why do we care about this distinction in
> > CI at all? In our existing
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 09:36 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > > Another argument from my side was that we require syntax-check and check
> > > to be executed
On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 09:36 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > Another argument from my side was that we require syntax-check and check
> > to be executed before posting patches to mailing list, having it under
> > single target
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:09:23PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 09:36:35AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:05:23AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 09:36:35AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:05:23AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:57 PM Ján Tomko wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:40:06PM
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:05:23AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:57 PM Ján Tomko wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > >On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:22
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:05:23AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:57 PM Ján Tomko wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > >On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:22 AM Fabiano Fidêncio
> > >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:57 PM Ján Tomko wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:22 AM Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:17 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:22 AM Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:17 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:22 PM Pavel Hrdina
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 02:55:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 10:39 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > We certainly could bundle meson with them, but given that in very
> > short time we're going to have libvirt, libvirt-dbus, osinfo-db-tools,
> > libosinfo, gtk-vnc,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:22 AM Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:17 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:22 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Meson build system is simple and
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 10:39 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> We certainly could bundle meson with them, but given that in very
> short time we're going to have libvirt, libvirt-dbus, osinfo-db-tools,
> libosinfo, gtk-vnc, spice-gtk all using meson, bundling meson in the
> individual tarballs
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:30:14AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 20:17 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > I didn't go through the patch, will do that in the next days ... but a
> > > few things should be
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 20:17 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > I didn't go through the patch, will do that in the next days ... but a
> > few things should be considered here:
> > - meson >= 0.49.0 basically means the project won't be
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:17 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:22 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > >
> > > Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
> > > able to fully replace our
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:22 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >
> > Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
> > able to fully replace our Autotools usage. There are few drawbacks as
> > it's a fairly new
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:39:17PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:20:43PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
> > able to fully replace our Autotools usage. There are few drawbacks as
> > it's a fairly new
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:22 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>
> Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
> able to fully replace our Autotools usage. There are few drawbacks as
> it's a fairly new build system, it requires Python 3.5 and Ninja 1.5.0,
> it's still evolving
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:20:43PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
able to fully replace our Autotools usage. There are few drawbacks as
it's a fairly new build system, it requires Python 3.5 and Ninja 1.5.0,
it's still evolving
Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
able to fully replace our Autotools usage. There are few drawbacks as
it's a fairly new build system, it requires Python 3.5 and Ninja 1.5.0,
it's still evolving and the user base is not that large and there were
some tweaks
21 matches
Mail list logo