On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 03:50:28PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> We currently know about three development branches: Fedora
> Rawhide, Debian sid and FreeBSD -CURRENT.
>
> For all three, we use the name of the development branch in
> the guest name; however, the value of os_version is not set
>
On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 14:15 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 15:50 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > We currently know about three development branches: Fedora
> > Rawhide, Debian sid and FreeBSD -CURRENT.
> >
> > For all three, we use the name of the development branch in
>
On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 15:50 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> We currently know about three development branches: Fedora
> Rawhide, Debian sid and FreeBSD -CURRENT.
>
> For all three, we use the name of the development branch in
> the guest name; however, the value of os_version is not set
> consis
We currently know about three development branches: Fedora
Rawhide, Debian sid and FreeBSD -CURRENT.
For all three, we use the name of the development branch in
the guest name; however, the value of os_version is not set
consistently, making it awkward to create package mappings
specific to these
