Re: [libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH] guests: Fix os_version for development branches

2018-06-05 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 03:50:28PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > We currently know about three development branches: Fedora > Rawhide, Debian sid and FreeBSD -CURRENT. > > For all three, we use the name of the development branch in > the guest name; however, the value of os_version is not set >

Re: [libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH] guests: Fix os_version for development branches

2018-06-05 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 14:15 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 15:50 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > We currently know about three development branches: Fedora > > Rawhide, Debian sid and FreeBSD -CURRENT. > > > > For all three, we use the name of the development branch in >

Re: [libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH] guests: Fix os_version for development branches

2018-05-22 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 15:50 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > We currently know about three development branches: Fedora > Rawhide, Debian sid and FreeBSD -CURRENT. > > For all three, we use the name of the development branch in > the guest name; however, the value of os_version is not set > consis

[libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH] guests: Fix os_version for development branches

2018-05-09 Thread Andrea Bolognani
We currently know about three development branches: Fedora Rawhide, Debian sid and FreeBSD -CURRENT. For all three, we use the name of the development branch in the guest name; however, the value of os_version is not set consistently, making it awkward to create package mappings specific to these