On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 13:24 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:16 PM Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Fabiano, let me know when it's a good time to push the patch and
> > apply the changes.
>
> Feel free to merge it whenever you have time. It's not going to cause
> any
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:16 PM Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:47 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:43:18PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 12:10 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:11 AM
On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:47 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:43:18PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 12:10 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:11 AM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > > > Instead of removing the syntax-check
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:43:18PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 12:10 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:11 AM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > > Instead of removing the syntax-check job we can keep it if we use
> > > 'suite' labels for our tests in a
On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 12:10 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:11 AM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > Instead of removing the syntax-check job we can keep it if we use
> > 'suite' labels for our tests in a way that we would use 'syntax' label
> > for syntax-check tests and 'unit'
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:10:21PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:11 AM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 06:19:54PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > It's been agreed that the projects using libvirt-jenkins-ci would have
> > > the `syntax-check`
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:11 AM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 06:19:54PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > It's been agreed that the projects using libvirt-jenkins-ci would have
> > the `syntax-check` running as part of their test suite. Therefore,
> > there's no reason for
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 06:19:54PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> It's been agreed that the projects using libvirt-jenkins-ci would have
> the `syntax-check` running as part of their test suite. Therefore,
> there's no reason for keeping a job which is not going to be used.
>
> Signed-off-by:
It's been agreed that the projects using libvirt-jenkins-ci would have
the `syntax-check` running as part of their test suite. Therefore,
there's no reason for keeping a job which is not going to be used.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio
---
.../build/projects/osinfo-db-tools.yml| 1 -