On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 05:57:57PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I'm a bit conflicted about this one: on one hand, unlike Debian 8 we
> haven't really run into any issue with Ubuntu 16.04, we can still
> build almost all projects on it, and it doesn't require any crazy
> hacks to maintain; on
On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 17:37 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 05:57:57PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > I'm a bit conflicted about this one: on one hand, unlike Debian 8 we
>
> I don't see a conflict. As your first patch says, our support policy
> has eliminated this
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 05:57:57PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I'm a bit conflicted about this one: on one hand, unlike Debian 8 we
I don't see a conflict. As your first patch says, our support policy
has eliminated this distro version, so there's no reason to have it
in CI.
Regards,
Daniel
On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 17:57 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I'm a bit conflicted about this one: on one hand, unlike Debian 8 we
> haven't really run into any issue with Ubuntu 16.04, we can still
> build almost all projects on it, and it doesn't require any crazy
> hacks to maintain; on the
I'm a bit conflicted about this one: on one hand, unlike Debian 8 we
haven't really run into any issue with Ubuntu 16.04, we can still
build almost all projects on it, and it doesn't require any crazy
hacks to maintain; on the other hand, perhaps the reason why we still
claim we can build almost
