On 04/28/2015 07:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> There's no need to mark a function as inline in the function
> declaration. In fact, it causes a compilation error:
>
> CC xmlgen.lo
> In file included from acl_parsing.h:29:0,
> from xmlgen.h:26,
> from
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:53:28AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 04/28/2015 07:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > There's no need to mark a function as inline in the function
> > declaration. In fact, it causes a compilation error:
> >
> > CC xmlgen.lo
> > In file included from acl_
On 28.04.2015 14:53, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 04/28/2015 07:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> There's no need to mark a function as inline in the function
>> declaration. In fact, it causes a compilation error:
>>
>> CC xmlgen.lo
>> In file included from acl_parsing.h:29:0,
>>
On 04/28/2015 07:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> There's no need to mark a function as inline in the function
> declaration. In fact, it causes a compilation error:
>
> CC xmlgen.lo
> In file included from acl_parsing.h:29:0,
> from xmlgen.h:26,
> from
There's no need to mark a function as inline in the function
declaration. In fact, it causes a compilation error:
CC xmlgen.lo
In file included from acl_parsing.h:29:0,
from xmlgen.h:26,
from capability_parsing.c:37:
list_util.h:67:21: error: inline functi