Hi,
There's still one bit I'm missing, here is my understanding so far:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 12:53:10PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:11:26PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Guest features (capabilities XML) - these are really just capabilities of
the
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:47:19PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hi,
There's still one bit I'm missing, here is my understanding so far:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 12:53:10PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:11:26PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Guest
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:01:25PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Opps, no I was meaning /domain/cpu/feature here, which is the
same schem as /capabilities/host/cpu/feature.
Ah thanks, that clears things up.
I forgot there was also a /domain/features which corresponds
to
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 05:02:37AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:30:39PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
+
+ gvir_config_xml_foreach_child(node, add_feature, data);
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:04:00PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com
wrote:
What would be these getters apart from the already existing _get_name?
The features under 'guest' can have boolean attributes, 'default' and
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:11:26PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:04:00PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com
wrote:
What would be these getters apart from the already existing _get_name?
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:30:39PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
From: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org
Not quite complete but its a good start.
CUT
---
+/**
+ *
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:30:39PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
From: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org
Not quite complete but its a good start.
---
libvirt-gconfig/Makefile.am| 11 ++-
...virt-gconfig-capabilities-cpu-feature-private.h | 39
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:30:39PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
From: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org
diff --git a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig.sym
b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig.sym
index ffeb16b..b1df17b 100644
--- a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig.sym
+++
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:30:39PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
+{
+ g_debug(Init GVirConfigCapabilitiesCPUFeature=%p, conn);
+
+ conn-priv = GVIR_CONFIG_CAPABILITIES_CPU_FEATURE_GET_PRIVATE(conn);
+}
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:35:07PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com
wrote:
Having a per-feature GVirConfigObject seems overkill since it will
only be a string wrapper, and a GVirConfigObject wrapping just a string
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:35:07PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com
wrote:
Having a per-feature GVirConfigObject seems overkill since it
From: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org
Not quite complete but its a good start.
---
libvirt-gconfig/Makefile.am| 11 ++-
...virt-gconfig-capabilities-cpu-feature-private.h | 39 ++
.../libvirt-gconfig-capabilities-cpu-feature.c | 77
13 matches
Mail list logo
