On 25.09.2012 14:30, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 25.09.2012 11:21, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Ping?
Can this patch go as is, or do we want to go all the way to switching to
GInitable as Marc-André suggested in
http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg59538.html ?
Christophe
I
Ping?
Can this patch go as is, or do we want to go all the way to switching to
GInitable as Marc-André suggested in
http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg59538.html ?
Christophe
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 05:49:21PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
For objects with a subtype
On 25.09.2012 11:21, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Ping?
Can this patch go as is, or do we want to go all the way to switching to
GInitable as Marc-André suggested in
http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg59538.html ?
Christophe
I think your approach is good, however
For objects with a subtype 'type' attribute, when the _new_from_xml
function was called, the 'type' attribute was forcefully set to the
right value rather than checking that the passed-in value matches
the type of the subclass we are trying to instantiate. This commit
changes this, and returns
