Re: [libvirt] [libvirt-python][PATCH] sanitytest: Sanitize VIR_TYPED_PARAM_*

2016-04-25 Thread Peter Krempa
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:35:30 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 22.04.2016 13:55, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:09:52 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > >> This test checks whether all enums that we produce in libvirt.py > >> have some reasonable value. But because of some

Re: [libvirt] [libvirt-python][PATCH] sanitytest: Sanitize VIR_TYPED_PARAM_*

2016-04-24 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 22.04.2016 13:55, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:09:52 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> This test checks whether all enums that we produce in libvirt.py >> have some reasonable value. But because of some crazy backcompat >> we have the following in libvirt-domain.h: >> >>

Re: [libvirt] [libvirt-python][PATCH] sanitytest: Sanitize VIR_TYPED_PARAM_*

2016-04-22 Thread Peter Krempa
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:09:52 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > This test checks whether all enums that we produce in libvirt.py > have some reasonable value. But because of some crazy backcompat > we have the following in libvirt-domain.h: > > VIR_DOMAIN_SCHED_FIELD_UINT =

[libvirt] [libvirt-python][PATCH] sanitytest: Sanitize VIR_TYPED_PARAM_*

2016-04-22 Thread Michal Privoznik
This test checks whether all enums that we produce in libvirt.py have some reasonable value. But because of some crazy backcompat we have the following in libvirt-domain.h: VIR_DOMAIN_SCHED_FIELD_UINT = VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT VIR_DOMAIN_SCHED_FIELD_ULLONG = VIR_TYPED_PARAM_ULLONG with