Re: [libvirt] [question] We can create two network of one same linux bridge or local ethernet. It is a bug?

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 07:30:03PM +0800, Sheldon wrote: We can create two network of one same linux bridge or local ethernet: This is not harmful. But I wonder should this case is allowed? Why? It should probably be rejected as invalid. virsh # net-list --all Name State Autostart

Re: [libvirt] [question] We can create two network of one same linux bridge or local ethernet. It is a bug?

2013-12-02 Thread Laine Stump
On 12/02/2013 11:52 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 07:30:03PM +0800, Sheldon wrote: We can create two network of one same linux bridge or local ethernet: This is not harmful. But I wonder should this case is allowed? Why? It should probably be rejected as invalid. In

Re: [libvirt] [question] We can create two network of one same linux bridge or local ethernet. It is a bug?

2013-12-02 Thread Sheldon
On 12/02/2013 10:48 PM, Laine Stump wrote: On 12/02/2013 11:52 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 07:30:03PM +0800, Sheldon wrote: We can create two network of one same linux bridge or local ethernet: This is not harmful. But I wonder should this case is allowed? Why? It

[libvirt] [question] We can create two network of one same linux bridge or local ethernet. It is a bug?

2013-11-30 Thread Sheldon
We can create two network of one same linux bridge or local ethernet: This is not harmful. But I wonder should this case is allowed? Why? more detail as follow. virsh # net-list --all Name State Autostart Persistent -- br1 active yes