Hi Eric,
I wasn't aware that my patch had been posted upstream.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:46:08PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 08:00 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > This is a backport of 71da3b66a8455faf8019effe3cf504a31f91f54a.
> > ---
> > src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c | 5 ++
On 09/12/2013 03:35 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> I wasn't aware that my patch had been posted upstream.
Yeah, my unfortunate email addressing was due to a glitch in the way
Guido posted the existing Debian patch queue for 0.9.12 to upstream,
such that my usual 'reply-to-all' sent to the
On 09/11/2013 08:00 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> This is a backport of 71da3b66a8455faf8019effe3cf504a31f91f54a.
> ---
> src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c | 5 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This is not identical to the contents of 71da3b6 (it's missing the last
hunk,
This is a backport of 71da3b66a8455faf8019effe3cf504a31f91f54a.
---
src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c
b/src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c
index 9a91dd9..7abb17b 100644
--- a/src/s
This is a backport of 71da3b66a8455faf8019effe3cf504a31f91f54a.
---
src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c
b/src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c
index 9a91dd9..7abb17b 100644
--- a/src/s
