On 06/06/2011 02:19 PM, John Lumby wrote:
> Hello Eric.
>
> I am fairly sure I remember *someone* saying they had integrated a
> modified version of the fix into libvirt but can't find any email saying
> so now. Maybe Daniel? On a very quick look at 0.9.2 source,
> it *appears* to hav
Hello Eric.
I am fairly sure I remember *someone* saying they had integrated a
modified version of the fix into libvirt but can't find any email saying
so now. Maybe Daniel? On a very quick look at 0.9.2 source,
it *appears* to have been implemented in qemu_command.c (but I didn'
[digging through old mail]
On 07/17/2010 10:58 AM, John Lumby wrote:
>>> I am wondering about
> the extent to which "old" qemu-0.11.1
>>> and kqemu-1.4.0 are
> supported by virt-manager.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It looks for presence of /dev/kqemu and a -no-kqemu arg in
>>
> QEMU's help. I had no idea tha
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:21:47 +0100
> From:
berra...@redhat.com
> To: johnlu...@hotmail.com
> CC:
libvir-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] (how much) support
for kqemu domain
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:11:48AM
-0400, John Lumby wrote:
> >
> >
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:21:47 +0100
> From:
berra...@redhat.com
> To: johnlu...@hotmail.com
> CC:
libvir-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] (how much) support
for kqemu domain
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:11:48AM
-0400, John Lumby wrote:
> >
> >
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:11:48AM -0400, John Lumby wrote:
>
> I am wondering about the extent to which "old" qemu-0.11.1
> and kqemu-1.4.0 are supported by virt-manager.
>
>
> I see I can specify --virt-type=kqemu on virt-install and
> it remembers domain type='kqemu', and does things such a
I am wondering about the extent to which "old" qemu-0.11.1 and kqemu-1.4.0 are
supported by virt-manager.
I see I can specify --virt-type=kqemu on virt-install and it remembers domain
type='kqemu', and does things such as refusing to start the vm if the kqemu
kernel mod not loaded, but it
