On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:50:56PM +0300, Dmitry Andreev wrote:
On 14.12.2015 18:10, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 17:18:22 +0300, Dmitry Andreev wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a mechanism to do a sequence of API calls as atomic
operation. Is there any way for libvirt's API client
On 15.12.2015 11:47, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:50:56PM +0300, Dmitry Andreev wrote:
On 14.12.2015 18:10, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 17:18:22 +0300, Dmitry Andreev wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a mechanism to do a sequence of API calls as atomic
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 03:26:44PM +0300, Dmitry Andreev wrote:
On 15.12.2015 11:47, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:50:56PM +0300, Dmitry Andreev wrote:
On 14.12.2015 18:10, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 17:18:22 +0300, Dmitry Andreev wrote:
Hi,
I'm
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 17:18:22 +0300, Dmitry Andreev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a mechanism to do a sequence of API calls as atomic
> operation. Is there any way for libvirt's API client to acquire an
> exclusive VM lock to prevent other client from changing VM state
> through libvirt?
On 14.12.2015 18:10, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 17:18:22 +0300, Dmitry Andreev wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a mechanism to do a sequence of API calls as atomic
operation. Is there any way for libvirt's API client to acquire an
exclusive VM lock to prevent other client from
Hi,
I'm looking for a mechanism to do a sequence of API calls as atomic
operation. Is there any way for libvirt's API client to acquire an
exclusive VM lock to prevent other client from changing VM state
through libvirt?
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
