On 04/29/2011 06:13 PM, Paolo Smiraglia wrote:
Hi to everyone!
Sorry for the latency of the response but me and my team we are noticed
that the TVD argument can not be treated only with a few lines in some
mails. In order to avoid any possible misunderstanding, we decided to
produce a little
Hi Paolo,
thanks for the document. I read it briefly and the design itself seems
good however in the document you mentioned moving the logic from
user-space to kernel-space which I'm not sure how would you like to
achieve this since libvirt itself is in the user-space stack and not
On 05/02/2011 03:12 PM, Paolo Smiraglia wrote:
Hi Michal!
Due to reduce the implementation time and verify quickly if our project
is feasible, we decided to implement the prototype by using the simplest
user-space applications (VTun, Open vSwitch).
To increase the security, we would like to
Also I'm still curious about my questions in my earlier response to you:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-April/msg00589.html
in particular:
1) does the network on each host always have a forward ... element for
forwarding local traffic directly out to the public
Paolo,
Did you see my recent email titled RFC: disconnecting guest/domain
interface config from host config:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-April/msg00591.html
We both want to expand the usage of network, so we'd do well to avoid
stepping on each others' toes!
Hi to everyone!
Sorry for the latency of the response but me and my team we are noticed
that the TVD argument can not be treated only with a few lines in some
mails. In order to avoid any possible misunderstanding, we decided to
produce a little report (just four pages with images) that describes
On 04/29/2011 12:13 PM, Paolo Smiraglia wrote:
Hi to everyone!
Sorry for the latency of the response but me and my team we are noticed
that the TVD argument can not be treated only with a few lines in some
mails. In order to avoid any possible misunderstanding, we decided to
produce a little
On 04/29/2011 01:32 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/29/2011 12:13 PM, Paolo Smiraglia wrote:
Hi to everyone!
Sorry for the latency of the response but me and my team we are noticed
that the TVD argument can not be treated only with a few lines in some
mails. In order to avoid any possible
On 04/06/2011 03:10 PM, Paolo Smiraglia wrote:
Hi to everyone! First of all, sorry for the thread subject change.
Due to the several issues of the Libvirt implementation of the Trusted
Virtual Domains (TVD), I decided to approach the topic in a modular manner.
Hi Paolo,
so basically this is
Hi Michael!
Thanks for the reply. Comments are inline.
Hi Paolo,
so basically this is about IPSec driver implementation to the libvirt ?
Exactly...
I don't think the idea is bad however I'm not working on libvirt too
much so you should ask libvirt guys about they opinion.
Since I think
On 04/12/2011 01:23 PM, Paolo Smiraglia wrote:
Hi Michael!
Thanks for the reply. Comments are inline.
Hi Paolo,
so basically this is about IPSec driver implementation to the libvirt ?
Exactly...
Ok, right. I don't know much about IPSec itself so some study on the
matter would be necessary
On 04/06/2011 09:10 AM, Paolo Smiraglia wrote:
Hi to everyone! First of all, sorry for the thread subject change.
Due to the several issues of the Libvirt implementation of the Trusted
Virtual Domains (TVD), I decided to approach the topic in a modular
manner.
I think that the first step
Hi to everyone! First of all, sorry for the thread subject change.
Due to the several issues of the Libvirt implementation of the Trusted
Virtual Domains (TVD), I decided to approach the topic in a modular manner.
I think that the first step should be to define the IPSec support or,
more in
13 matches
Mail list logo
