On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:44:18AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:40:17PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > This is a refactoring of the XM driver. Previously we would store
> > the virConfPtr objects as our master 'in memory' representation
> > of inactive domains. T
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 05:10:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:44:18AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:40:17PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > This is a refactoring of the XM driver. Previously we would store
> > > the virConfPtr
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:44:18AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:40:17PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > This is a refactoring of the XM driver. Previously we would store
> > the virConfPtr objects as our master 'in memory' representation
> > of inactive domains. T
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:40:17PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This is a refactoring of the XM driver. Previously we would store
> the virConfPtr objects as our master 'in memory' representation
> of inactive domains. This switch it over to using virDomainDefPtr
> objects instead. The code f
