"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> There are a huge list of functions in POSIX which are not
> safe to use from multiple threads currently. I generated
> the list by looking at all libc symbol exports for variants
> which have a parallel _r symbol.
>
>nm -D --defined-only /lib/libc.so.6 \
>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:44:51PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> There are a huge list of functions in POSIX which are not
> safe to use from multiple threads currently. I generated
> the list by looking at all libc symbol exports for variants
> which have a parallel _r symbol.
>
>nm -D -
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:44:51PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The readdir one is also unneccessary, since reading from a single
> DIR* is safe from a single thread. readdir_r is also horrific
>
> http://womble.decadentplace.org.uk/readdir_r-advisory.html
That web page also says that readd
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:44:51PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> There are a huge list of functions in POSIX which are not
> safe to use from multiple threads currently. I generated
> the list by looking at all libc symbol exports for variants
> which have a parallel _r symbol.
>
>nm -D -
There are a huge list of functions in POSIX which are not
safe to use from multiple threads currently. I generated
the list by looking at all libc symbol exports for variants
which have a parallel _r symbol.
nm -D --defined-only /lib/libc.so.6 \
| grep '_r$' \
| awk '{print $3}' \
