On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:32:54AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:23:08AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> >> Hi, Dan
> >>
> >> Thank you for commenting.
> >> Of course, I agree your point
> >> and that you are commiting it.
> >>
> >> I am comme
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:23:08AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
>> Hi, Dan
>>
>> Thank you for commenting.
>> Of course, I agree your point
>> and that you are commiting it.
>>
>> I am commenting it
>> just because 2 month is not old ago in my feeling.
>>
>>
>> Here Is
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:23:08AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> Hi, Dan
>
> Thank you for commenting.
> Of course, I agree your point
> and that you are commiting it.
>
> I am commenting it
> just because 2 month is not old ago in my feeling.
>
>
> Here Is the memo for my understanding.
> (S
Hi, Dan
Thank you for commenting.
Of course, I agree your point
and that you are commiting it.
I am commenting it
just because 2 month is not old ago in my feeling.
Here Is the memo for my understanding.
(Since I am not familiar with KVM)
2007/07/19 kvm-30 Guest SMP support
(Parameter(KV
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 01:29:35PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
>> Hi, Dan
>>
>> I think the qemu_driver should check KVM_API_VERSION for SMP support.
>> How do you think?
>> I am worrying about MAX_VCPUS=16 changes to 32 in future.
>
> If it increases to 32, then we sho
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 01:29:35PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> Hi, Dan
>
> I think the qemu_driver should check KVM_API_VERSION for SMP support.
> How do you think?
> I am worrying about MAX_VCPUS=16 changes to 32 in future.
If it increases to 32, then we should certainly check based on somethi
Hi, Dan
I think the qemu_driver should check KVM_API_VERSION for SMP support.
How do you think?
I am worrying about MAX_VCPUS=16 changes to 32 in future.
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
"Daniel P. Berrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't bother trying to detect old versions of KVM which are UP only
Libvirt currently returns '1' when asked for the maximum number of VCPUs
supported for KVM guests. KVM long long ago gained SMP support, so this
patch fixes it to return 16, whcih is the current supported number. I
don't bother trying to detect old versions of KVM which are UP only
because I find
