Re: [libvirt] Plan A or Plan B?

2012-11-19 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 11/19/2012 03:51 PM, Laine Stump wrote: On 11/19/2012 03:27 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: On 11/19/2012 01:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote: Here is an open BZ that mentions the idea of adding similar functionality for dnsmasq (see comment 8, in particular): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg

Re: [libvirt] Plan A or Plan B?

2012-11-19 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 11/19/2012 02:24 PM, Laine Stump wrote: 1. In a manner similar to what is done for IPV6, add ip6tables rules >>>to permit virtual systems to communicate via a defined virtual >>>interface which has no gateway addresses defined. This does mean that >>>virtual systems will not be able to commu

Re: [libvirt] Plan A or Plan B?

2012-11-19 Thread Laine Stump
On 11/19/2012 03:27 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > On 11/19/2012 01:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >> Here is an open BZ that mentions the idea of adding similar >> functionality for dnsmasq (see comment 8, in particular): >> >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824573 > I also found Comment

Re: [libvirt] Plan A or Plan B?

2012-11-19 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 11/19/2012 01:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote: Here is an open BZ that mentions the idea of adding similar functionality for dnsmasq (see comment 8, in particular): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824573 I also found Comment 2 where Dave Allan says "The intent is that people who want

Re: [libvirt] Plan A or Plan B?

2012-11-19 Thread Laine Stump
On 11/19/2012 01:50 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > SInce I wrote this, I have "Plan B" about a half to two-thirds > complete as far as the coding goes. I have this "feeling" that > postponing the conf-file changes might be better. > > On 11/19/2012 01:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >> On 11/19/2012 08:31

Re: [libvirt] Plan A or Plan B?

2012-11-19 Thread Gene Czarcinski
SInce I wrote this, I have "Plan B" about a half to two-thirds complete as far as the coding goes. I have this "feeling" that postponing the conf-file changes might be better. On 11/19/2012 01:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote: On 11/19/2012 08:31 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: Plan A: This consists of

Re: [libvirt] Plan A or Plan B?

2012-11-19 Thread Laine Stump
On 11/19/2012 08:31 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > Plan A: > > This consists of the set of patches I have submitted for conf-file, > DHCPv6, etc. The response has been a resounding SILENCE. Thus, I am > assuming that there is some reluctance to adopting these changes in > their current form. This

[libvirt] Plan A or Plan B?

2012-11-19 Thread Gene Czarcinski
Plan A: This consists of the set of patches I have submitted for conf-file, DHCPv6, etc. The response has been a resounding SILENCE. Thus, I am assuming that there is some reluctance to adopting these changes in their current form. This especially includes the conf-file changes. While I b

[libvirt] Plan A or Plan B?

2012-11-18 Thread Gene Czarcinski
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list