On 11/19/2012 03:51 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 11/19/2012 03:27 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/19/2012 01:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
Here is an open BZ that mentions the idea of adding similar
functionality for dnsmasq (see comment 8, in particular):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
On 11/19/2012 02:24 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
1. In a manner similar to what is done for IPV6, add ip6tables rules
>>>to permit virtual systems to communicate via a defined virtual
>>>interface which has no gateway addresses defined. This does mean that
>>>virtual systems will not be able to commu
On 11/19/2012 03:27 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 01:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
>> Here is an open BZ that mentions the idea of adding similar
>> functionality for dnsmasq (see comment 8, in particular):
>>
>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824573
> I also found Comment
On 11/19/2012 01:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
Here is an open BZ that mentions the idea of adding similar
functionality for dnsmasq (see comment 8, in particular):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824573
I also found Comment 2 where Dave Allan says "The intent is that people
who want
On 11/19/2012 01:50 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> SInce I wrote this, I have "Plan B" about a half to two-thirds
> complete as far as the coding goes. I have this "feeling" that
> postponing the conf-file changes might be better.
>
> On 11/19/2012 01:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
>> On 11/19/2012 08:31
SInce I wrote this, I have "Plan B" about a half to two-thirds complete
as far as the coding goes. I have this "feeling" that postponing the
conf-file changes might be better.
On 11/19/2012 01:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 11/19/2012 08:31 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Plan A:
This consists of
On 11/19/2012 08:31 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> Plan A:
>
> This consists of the set of patches I have submitted for conf-file,
> DHCPv6, etc. The response has been a resounding SILENCE. Thus, I am
> assuming that there is some reluctance to adopting these changes in
> their current form. This
Plan A:
This consists of the set of patches I have submitted for conf-file,
DHCPv6, etc. The response has been a resounding SILENCE. Thus, I am
assuming that there is some reluctance to adopting these changes in
their current form. This especially includes the conf-file changes.
While I b
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
