On 09/29/11 02:39, Chris Wright wrote:
Can you help narrow down what is happening during the additional 12
seconds in the guest? For example, does a quick simple boot to single
user mode happen at the same boot speed w/ and w/out vhost_net?
Not tried (would probably be too short to measure
* Reeted (ree...@shiftmail.org) wrote:
On 09/28/11 11:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:19:43AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
On 09/28/11 09:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
You could have equivalently used
-netdev tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=no,id=hostnet0,vhost=on
* Reeted (ree...@shiftmail.org) wrote:
On 09/29/11 02:39, Chris Wright wrote:
Can you help narrow down what is happening during the additional 12
seconds in the guest? For example, does a quick simple boot to single
user mode happen at the same boot speed w/ and w/out vhost_net?
Not tried
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:10:21PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
I repost this, this time by also including the libvirt mailing list.
Info on my libvirt: it's the version in Ubuntu 11.04 Natty which is
0.8.8-1ubuntu6.5 . I didn't recompile this one, while Kernel and
qemu-kvm are vanilla and compiled
On 09/28/11 09:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:10:21PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
I repost this, this time by also including the libvirt mailing list.
Info on my libvirt: it's the version in Ubuntu 11.04 Natty which is
0.8.8-1ubuntu6.5 . I didn't recompile this one, while
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:19:43AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
On 09/28/11 09:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This is my bash commandline:
/opt/qemu-kvm-0.14.1/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc-0.14 -enable-kvm
-m 2002 -smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 -name vmname1-1 -uuid
On 09/28/11 11:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:19:43AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
On 09/28/11 09:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This is my bash commandline:
/opt/qemu-kvm-0.14.1/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc-0.14 -enable-kvm
-m 2002 -smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 -name
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
On 09/28/11 11:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:19:43AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
On 09/28/11 09:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This is my bash commandline:
/opt/qemu-kvm-0.14.1/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc-0.14
On 09/28/11 11:53, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
YES!
It's the vhost. With vhost=on it takes about 12 seconds more time to boot.
...meaning? :-)
I've no idea. I was always under the impression that 'vhost=on' was
the 'make it go much faster'
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:19:09PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
On 09/28/11 11:53, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
YES!
It's the vhost. With vhost=on it takes about 12 seconds more time to boot.
...meaning? :-)
I've no idea. I was always under the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:19:09PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
On 09/28/11 11:53, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
YES!
It's the vhost. With vhost=on it takes about 12 seconds more time to boot.
...meaning? :-)
I've no idea. I was always under the
On 09/28/11 14:56, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:19:09PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
Ok that seems to work: it removes the vhost part in the virsh launch
hence cutting down 12secs of boot time.
If nobody comes out with an explanation of why, I will open another
thread on the
On 09/28/11 16:51, Reeted wrote:
On 09/28/11 14:56, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:19:09PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
Ok that seems to work: it removes the vhost part in the virsh launch
hence cutting down 12secs of boot time.
If nobody comes out with an explanation of why, I
I repost this, this time by also including the libvirt mailing list.
Info on my libvirt: it's the version in Ubuntu 11.04 Natty which is
0.8.8-1ubuntu6.5 . I didn't recompile this one, while Kernel and
qemu-kvm are vanilla and compiled by hand as described below.
My original message follows:
14 matches
Mail list logo
