Re: [libvirt] Question about more finer access control permission on libvirt

2008-05-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:36:09AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: Hi, Dan Thank you for commenting this. I am eased to hear this. I also agrees this issue has many task. p.s. I want to know the possibility of fine grained access control in libvirt, since our young guy is investigating the

Re: [libvirt] Question about more finer access control permission on libvirt

2008-05-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 09:49:19AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: I have a question of libvirt with Polkit. Currently, the libvirt w/ Polkit has 2 access control permissions. (Read Only and Read Write) Have you planned to expand the access control more finer? In my use case, Policy should

Re: [libvirt] Question about more finer access control permission on libvirt

2008-05-15 Thread Atsushi SAKAI
Hi, Dan Thank you for commenting this. I am eased to hear this. I also agrees this issue has many task. p.s. I want to know the possibility of fine grained access control in libvirt, since our young guy is investigating the access control in Dom0-Xen. Thanks Atsushi SAKAI Daniel P. Berrange

[libvirt] Question about more finer access control permission on libvirt

2008-05-08 Thread Atsushi SAKAI
Hi, Dan I have a question of libvirt with Polkit. Currently, the libvirt w/ Polkit has 2 access control permissions. (Read Only and Read Write) Have you planned to expand the access control more finer? In my use case, Policy should define by domain, operation, operator. Of course, operator is