Re: [libvirt] RFC: Changing version number at start of dev cycle instead of end

2013-12-12 Thread Laine Stump
On 12/11/2013 06:44 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > The solution here is fairly simple. We should increase the version > number in configure.ac at the *start* of each release cycle. This > means that libvirt-python can use the next version number and things > will 'just work'. I don't think this i

Re: [libvirt] RFC: Changing version number at start of dev cycle instead of end

2013-12-11 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:59:55AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 12/11/2013 09:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Currently throughout the dev cycle we stick on the current release > > number. The release number in configure.ac is only changed by DV > > when he is actually cutting the release. >

Re: [libvirt] RFC: Changing version number at start of dev cycle instead of end

2013-12-11 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/11/2013 09:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Currently throughout the dev cycle we stick on the current release > number. The release number in configure.ac is only changed by DV > when he is actually cutting the release. > > The solution here is fairly simple. We should increase the versi

[libvirt] RFC: Changing version number at start of dev cycle instead of end

2013-12-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
Currently throughout the dev cycle we stick on the current release number. The release number in configure.ac is only changed by DV when he is actually cutting the release. With the python bindings now being split out, this is causing us problems. The python code aims to build against any libvirt