On 11/01/2013 03:55 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 06:50:57PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 10/30/2013 12:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/30/2013 01:00 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 10/30/2013 11:37 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 06:50:57PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > On 10/30/2013 12:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/30/2013 01:00 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 10/30/2013 11:37 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>>
> On 10/30/2013 11:38 AM,
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 06:23 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
>
>>> + for (i = 0; i < virBitmapSize(cpumask); ++i) {
>>> + bool bit;
>>> + if (virBitmapGetBit(cpumask, i, &bit) < 0) {
>>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>>> + _("Failed to get cpumask bit '%zd' with
>>> libxenlight"),
On 10/31/2013 06:23 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> + for (i = 0; i < virBitmapSize(cpumask); ++i) {
>> + bool bit;
>> + if (virBitmapGetBit(cpumask, i, &bit) < 0) {
>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>> + _("Failed to get cpumask bit '%zd' with
>> libxenlight"), i);
>
> I don't think that is t
On 10/31/2013 05:23 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> On 10/24/2013 02:52 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:46:14AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Hi all,
I posted this bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013045)
to
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 12:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/2013 01:00 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/30/2013 11:37 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>
On 10/30/2013 11:38 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> libxl: fix dubious cpuma
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/24/2013 02:52 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:46:14AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I posted this bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013045)
> >> to the Redhat Bugzilla a while ago, and the only
On 10/30/2013 12:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 01:00 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>> On 10/30/2013 11:37 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 10/30/2013 11:38 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
libxl: fix dubious cpumask handling in libxlDomainSetVcpuAffinities
Rather
On 10/30/2013 01:00 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> On 10/30/2013 11:37 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 10/30/2013 11:38 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>>> libxl: fix dubious cpumask handling in libxlDomainSetVcpuAffinities
>>>
>>> Rather than casting the virBitmap pointer to uint8_t*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/30/2013 11:37 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 11:38 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> libxl: fix dubious cpumask handling in libxlDomainSetVcpuAffinities
>>
>> Rather than casting the virBitmap pointer to uint8_t* and then us
On 10/30/2013 11:38 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> libxl: fix dubious cpumask handling in libxlDomainSetVcpuAffinities
>
> Rather than casting the virBitmap pointer to uint8_t* and then using
> the structure contents as a byte array, use the virBitmap API to
> determine
> the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/24/2013 02:52 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:46:14AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I posted this bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013045)
>> to the Redhat Bugzilla a while ago, a
On 10/24/2013 02:52 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:46:14AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I posted this bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013045)
>> to the Redhat Bugzilla a while ago, and the only response has been to
>> post a note to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/24/2013 02:52 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:46:14AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I posted this bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013045)
>> to the Redhat Bugzilla a while ago, a
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:46:14AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I posted this bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013045)
> to the Redhat Bugzilla a while ago, and the only response has been to
> post a note to this list about the bug.
>
> Summary below, but it lo
Hi all,
I posted this bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013045)
to the Redhat Bugzilla a while ago, and the only response has been to
post a note to this list about the bug.
Summary below, but it looks like a pretty clear use-after-free or
something. The full details are attached
16 matches
Mail list logo